豆豆友情提示：这是一个非官方 GitHub 代理镜像，主要用于网络测试或访问加速。请勿在此进行登录、注册或处理任何敏感信息。进行这些操作请务必访问官方网站 github.com。 Raw 内容也通过此代理提供。
Skip to content

OpenClaw: Matrix room control-command authorization no longer trusts DM pairing-store entries

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Apr 16, 2026 in openclaw/openclaw

Package

npm openclaw (npm)

Affected versions

> 2026.3.28, < 2026.4.15

Patched versions

2026.4.15

Description

Summary

Matrix room control-command authorization used the effective allowlist for room traffic, which included sender IDs learned from the Matrix DM pairing store. A sender who was allowed only for a Matrix DM could therefore authorize room control commands when they also posted in a bot room.

Impact

This bypass let a DM-paired Matrix sender cross the DM/room authorization boundary and run Matrix room control commands without being present in the configured room allowlist, room membership list, or group allowlist. The issue required a sender already present in the pairing store and able to send to the target Matrix room. Severity remains high because room control commands can drive privileged OpenClaw behavior depending on the deployment's command and tool policy.

Affected versions

  • Affected: > 2026.3.28, < 2026.4.15
  • Patched: 2026.4.15

Fix

OpenClaw 2026.4.15 fixes the authorization boundary. Room control-command authorizers now use only configured sender IDs, effective room users, and group allowlists; DM pairing-store entries no longer authorize room commands. A follow-up change also skips DM pairing-store reads on room traffic.

Verified in v2026.4.15:

  • extensions/matrix/src/matrix/monitor/access-state.ts builds room command authorizers from commandAllowFrom, which excludes pairing-store sender IDs for room traffic.
  • extensions/matrix/src/matrix/monitor/handler.ts gates room control commands through those authorizers.
  • extensions/matrix/src/matrix/monitor/access-state.test.ts covers a DM pairing-store sender and verifies it cannot authorize room control commands.

Fix commits included in v2026.4.15 and absent from v2026.4.14:

  • f8705f512b09043df02b5da372c33374734bd921 via PR #67294
  • 2bfd808a83116bd888e3e2633a61473fa2ed81b6 via PR #67325

Thanks to @nexrin and Keen Security Lab for reporting this issue.

References

@steipete steipete published to openclaw/openclaw Apr 16, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Apr 17, 2026
Reviewed Apr 17, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector Network
Attack Complexity Low
Attack Requirements None
Privileges Required Low
User interaction None
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality None
Integrity High
Availability None
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality None
Integrity None
Availability None

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector: This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. This metric value (and consequently the resulting severity) will be larger the more remote (logically, and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerable system. The assumption is that the number of potential attackers for a vulnerability that could be exploited from across a network is larger than the number of potential attackers that could exploit a vulnerability requiring physical access to a device, and therefore warrants a greater severity.
Attack Complexity: This metric captures measurable actions that must be taken by the attacker to actively evade or circumvent existing built-in security-enhancing conditions in order to obtain a working exploit. These are conditions whose primary purpose is to increase security and/or increase exploit engineering complexity. A vulnerability exploitable without a target-specific variable has a lower complexity than a vulnerability that would require non-trivial customization. This metric is meant to capture security mechanisms utilized by the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: This metric captures the prerequisite deployment and execution conditions or variables of the vulnerable system that enable the attack. These differ from security-enhancing techniques/technologies (ref Attack Complexity) as the primary purpose of these conditions is not to explicitly mitigate attacks, but rather, emerge naturally as a consequence of the deployment and execution of the vulnerable system.
Privileges Required: This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess prior to successfully exploiting the vulnerability. The method by which the attacker obtains privileged credentials prior to the attack (e.g., free trial accounts), is outside the scope of this metric. Generally, self-service provisioned accounts do not constitute a privilege requirement if the attacker can grant themselves privileges as part of the attack.
User interaction: This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable system. This metric determines whether the vulnerability can be exploited solely at the will of the attacker, or whether a separate user (or user-initiated process) must participate in some manner.
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the VULNERABLE SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

EPSS score

Weaknesses

Incorrect Authorization

The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

No known CVE

GHSA ID

GHSA-2gvc-4f3c-2855

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
Improvements are not currently accepted on this advisory because it uses an unsupported versioning operator. Read more and discuss here.